Walking Around By Pablo Neruda Essay Example For Students

Walking Around By Pablo Neruda Essay Pablo Neruda gives us a good example of Vanguard Literature in his poem WalkingAround. We can see the influence of surrealism in the poem because it does notrhyme at all, instead is an effort to express feelings and emotions in a freestyle. We can also see the existentialism idea as Neruda is bold and tells useverything that is in his mind. Neruda tells us what he thinks about society ingeneral. In this poem we can see that Neruda is tired of technology, he saysthat he no longer desires to see elevators, or merchandise, or movie theaters. He is tired of all the new inventions humans have made. He is tired of seeingthe same things over and over again wherever he goes. Same shoe shops, samestores, etc. In my opinion, he thinks that we have lost our individuality andthat we all own the exact same artifacts and we all want to have whatevereveryone else has. I also think that hes sorry that humans cannot appreciatethe beauty of nature, and are polluting it with factories, buildings, and alike. We will write a custom essay on Walking Around By Pablo Neruda specifically for you for only $16.38 $13.9/page Order now Neruda grew up in the wilderness, and I think that he misses the wild landscapesand the fresh air he used to breath when he was a boy. The line that confused mewas when he says that it would be delicious to kill a nun. I thoughtthat because of his experience of loosing a friend during war, he would beagainst any kind of violence. But, I then I thought that since existentialismconsists of an active role of the will, and not the reason, Neruda was justbeing spontaneous. He probably was just trying to get out all that he felt, evenif this meant going to the extremes. Neruda was probably disappointed of the newinventions, and the destruction of nature and man itself. This poem clearlyshows that Neruda is tired of living in the world around him.

Sentences with Interrogative Elements Are Not Questions

Sentences with Interrogative Elements Are Not Questions Sentences with Interrogative Elements Are Not Questions Sentences with Interrogative Elements Are Not Questions By Mark Nichol Writers sometimes erroneously assume that when a statement includes a phrase beginning with who, what, when, where, why, or how (or what or which), it should be treated as an interrogative, or question. However, whether the sentence should be punctuated with a question mark depends on how a verb is juxtaposed with the interrogative word and how the sentence is otherwise structured. Each of the sentences below is incorrectly treated as a question. Discussion after each example describes the problem, and a revision solves it. 1. It is essential to ask why organizations have vendors, and how organizations get those vendors set up? This sentence is declarative, not interrogative, so a period should replace the question mark. However, the two key phrases in it can be converted to questions by inserting a verb after each of the interrogative words and posing the resultant questions as if they were being quoted: â€Å"It is essential to ask, ‘Why do organizations have vendors?† and ‘How can organizations get those vendors set up?’† 2. One has to question how is any award that includes  the words â€Å"Best Female† still a thing? To convert the sentence to a declarative statement, is must be relocated to precede â€Å"still a thing†: â€Å"One has to question how any award that includes  the words ‘Best Female’ is still a thing.† To enable it to function as a question, the sentence must be restructured so that the interrogative core is established as a conjectural quotation within a declarative statement: â€Å"One has to ask the question ‘How is any award that includes  the words â€Å"Best Female† still a thing?’† 3. We must prioritize and clearly identify what are these top infrastructure issues and make a meaningful decision about where do we spend the money as it relates to infrastructure? Just as with the previous example, the form of the verb â€Å"to be† must be moved: â€Å"We must prioritize and clearly identify what these top infrastructure issues are and make a meaningful decision about where we spend the money as it relates to infrastructure.† To enable the questions embedded in this sentence to function as interrogatives, the statement must be heavily revised and subdivided to isolate them: â€Å"What are these top infrastructure issues? Where do we spend the money as it relates to infrastructure? We must prioritize and clearly identify problems to answer the first question and make a meaningful decision about the second one.† Want to improve your English in five minutes a day? Get a subscription and start receiving our writing tips and exercises daily! Keep learning! Browse the Grammar category, check our popular posts, or choose a related post below:12 Types of Languageâ€Å"As Well As† Does Not Mean â€Å"And†Preposition Review #1: Chance of vs. Chance for